(1) Open iTunes and change iTunes store to United States. (2) Goto App Store of US and Click to buy a free app (3) Choose to create a new account and enter email address and password and other questions. Strange Lagging in GNOME and KDE Hey there! Sonnox oxford inflator crack. I installed arch and Gnome (and later tried) on my desktop computer today and it worked free from lag for about one hour. Now it's behaving very strange, and I've been close to throwing my monitors out the window about 20 times. However, I don't know what's causing the problem and therefore don't know how to fix it. I will try to describe this mysterious lagging: Sometimes when I'm surfing the web with chromium (or using any other application so far) the windows kind of freeze. I'm unable to click anything in the window, and I can't go to the 'Activities' in the top left corner. It always happens when I'm running the terminal (rxvt) and chromium at the same time. I can't change the focus of the windows by clicking on them, but I can change the focus by alt-tabbing. Can I debug this or something, cause now it's close to unusable? (I'm quite new to arch, so please don't reply with ultra-advanced maneuvers) Last edited by Rydberg95 (2013-07-23 19:37:35). Similar Messages • Kde Libraries/Base/Bindings - 80 megs Full KDE - 200 megs Full GNOME - 80 megs Base Gnome - 55 megs I hear so many people saying 'Ew, it's using gnome-libs I don't wanna install that' I have said this many times. It's seemed like a lot of usage on my hard drive with all those packages. In reality, 50 megs for GNOME libs or 80 megs for KDE isn't a lot at all. Heck, UT2004 is around 90 times bigger than installing base KDE and GNOME libs. Thanks to modern technology, most PCs have 80 - 120 gigs on them. Even with this 30 gig hard drive, 150 megs does not even put a dent. Unless your using a floppy for your hard drive, it won't hurt to install gnome and kde libaries. You need a gig and a half for just winblows stuff! Just because it says: Targets: hal-0.2.97-2 libgsf-1.9.1-1 gnome-desktop-2.8.0-1 nautilus-2.8.1-1 nautilus-cd-burner-2.8.1-1 libdvdcss-1.2.8-1 libdvdread-0.9.4-2 libdvdnav-0.1.9-2 faac-1.24-1 faad2-2.0-5 hermes-1.3.3-1 libmikmod-3.1.11-1 gtk-1.2.10-4 mjpegtools-1.6.2-1 gst-plugins-0.8.5-1 totem-0.99.19-2 Total Package Size: 11.5 MB Proceed with upgrade? [Y/n] It seems like a lot of depedencies, being on four lines and all. But it's really not that much. I won't hurt to have it on your PC. Just my.2 for the day xerxes2 wrote: kth5 wrote:hmm, i have exactly the same scenario on my laptop. It's only a Celeron 700 + 256MB ram. I run kde, mozilla thunderbird, several konsole session, xchat2, xmms plus some more konqueror session w/o any problem. Only thing that is lagging behind is my GFX card which needs a share of the system memory. Anway, my system in KDE w/ all these apps up needs only ~120MB the rest is filled up w/ diskcache or whatever. It's not bad for a desktop system that is not supposed to render 3D or viewing 100MB+ large files from memory. I'm impressed! I havn't tried kde since 3.2.0 and it was totally unusuable due to bugs, crashes, bloat and so forth, the kde devs must been busy since then. Pupcet reviewer 2017 pdf. I was even quite impressed with KDE 3.3.x. I use KDM for my default DM all the time. GDM is too buggy. WDM/XDM too ugly. I actually made KDM look pretty sexy. People say you can't, but it's not that hard. I'll make some screenies if anyone want some • Is X-windows and GUI desktops supported on the ODA 'engineered system' running a RAC database? If it is, what is the yum command needed to install the X-windows, Gnome, and KDE package groups? While I agree with the direction of the suggestions with installing packages for X-windows, we do not have a blanket 'apply any package' recommendation. In particular we do not support altering the kernel (although we do have exceptions which we review on a case by case basis). Basically, if the you want to alter functionality that would not impact core functionality you are usually fine. A good guideling is: The more dependencies that there are between the package / rpm you are considering using the higher the potential impact on functionality - meaning higher chance for problems Note: We do use VNC including Real and Tiger regularly, but we have no hard recommendation on how you may want to use X-windows. I have never seen a limitation other than comments on bugs or incompatibility within the X-window product itself with certain kernel levels. Patching may overwrite some packages that you may install, however, _depending on packages/rpms added_ there is also the possibility that you will break existing functionality to the point that patching itself will fail ( we have already seen a few cases of this in which case the proper mitigation is to remove / roll-back any alterations to the ODA before patching, and then adding the packages/rpms back after the patching is completed. From what you are discussing the impact should be low without conflicts, but please consider the above, and if you have specific packages which you consider potential problems please create an SR so that we can review packages / rpms on an individual basis.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |